Skip to main content

Webinar 9/30: CodeMender: AI Code Security Agent

  • August 18, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 117 views

pandamoose
Staff
Forum|alt.badge.img+2

Hi all,

You’ve been sleeping under a rock if you haven’t heard about the frontier AI models “hacking” their way out of sandboxes and finding vulnerabilities to break into production systems.  But how many of you are trying to reverse that playbook and use AI for defensive security to autonomously find and fix vulnerabilities in your codebase before the bad guys do?

I am moderating a discussion called "CodeMender: AI Code Security Agent." We'll get straight into practical approaches to how to secure your codebase at machine-speed.

We'll cover:

  • Deep Vulnerability Scanning: Go beyond static scanning and use multiple AI models to deeply scan your codebase to uncover zero-day and n-day vulnerabilities.

  • Exploit Simulation & Verification: Methods for running automated exploit simulations to verify which vulnerabilities are actually exploitable, drastically reducing false positives.

  • Automated Code Remediation: How to drastically shrink the remediation bottleneck with  automated code fix testing and patching using AI.

  • Developer-in-the-Loop: Best practices for integrating autonomous patching seamlessly into developer workflows and CI/CD pipelines.

I’m keen to share what we're learning and hear your thoughts.

Session Details:

  • When: September 30, 2026, multiple regional times zones available

  • Registration/Replay: Register Here

What are the biggest challenges you're currently facing when it comes to managing code vulnerability backlogs? Hope to see you there.

Cheers,
Doug

3 replies

whathehack81
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • Bronze 1
  • August 20, 2026

One of the biggest challenges I see isn’t discovery, it’s proving which findings actually deserve remediation priority.

Static tools can create a huge backlog, but severity alone doesn’t answer whether a path is reachable, attacker-controlled, or exploitable in the deployed environment. The expensive part is often validating those conditions and producing evidence engineering teams trust.

I’d be especially interested in how CodeMender handles that boundary: whether exploit simulation feeds directly back into prioritization, and how it distinguishes “technically vulnerable” from “validated exploitable” without letting an autonomous agent overstate confidence.

If the system can reduce that validation cycle while preserving reproducible evidence, that’s probably more valuable operationally than simply increasing finding volume.


pandamoose
Staff
Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Author
  • Staff
  • August 21, 2026

​@whathehack81 absolutely.  That's a great insight.  And that’s exactly one of the topics we’ll cover in this webinar.  How CodeMender does exploit simulations and how that can be fed back into prioritization with cloud security tools like Wiz and Security Command Center.


Andaluce
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Bronze 1
  • September 19, 2026

Secured my spot a while back—really looking forward to this webinar!

Moving from raw finding volume to active exploit simulation is definitely where the industry needs to go to beat triage fatigue.

Beyond prioritizing what to fix, I’m especially curious about how CodeMender handles architectural and semantic integrity on the remediation side. In complex systems, an autonomous patch can easily pass narrow unit tests while subtly shifting runtime behavior or introducing latent drift across dependent services. How does the agent verify that an autonomous fix actually hardens the boundary without altering wider system intent?