Skip to main content
Question

Best Practice: BindPlane Agent Integration for Linux Servers - Optimal LogType Selection

  • January 27, 2026
  • 0 replies
  • 8 views

nelsos.torres
Forum|alt.badge.img

I need guidance on the optimal integration approach for ingesting Linux server logs into Google SecOps/Chronicle using the BindPlane agent.

Specific Questions:

1. Recommended LogType for Linux Systems
   - What is the most appropriate log_type for general Linux server logs in Chronicle?
   - Should we use "LINUX_SYSLOG", "SYSLOG", or a more specific parser?
   - Are there different log_types recommended for different distributions (SUSE/Ubuntu/RHEL)?

2. BindPlane Agent Configuration
   - Best practices for configuring BindPlane agent on Linux servers
   - Recommended log sources to collect (syslog, auth.log, secure, audit, etc.)
   - Optimal pipeline configuration for Chronicle ingestion

3. Integration Architecture
   - Should logs go directly from BindPlane → Chronicle, or through Chronicle Forwarder?
   - Recommended namespace configuration for multi-client environments
   - Label strategy for distinguishing between different Linux distributions

4. Log Collection Scope
   - Essential log files to monitor for security operations
   - Performance considerations for multi-source collection
   - Filtering recommendations to optimize ingestion costs

Current Setup:
We're deploying across multiple enterprise clients and need to standardize our Linux server integration approach to ensure optimal parsing, searchability, and detection rule effectiveness.

Goal:
Establish a standardized, efficient integration that maximizes Chronicle's parsing capabilities and UDM normalization for Linux logs across different distributions.

Any official documentation, configuration examples, or community best practices would be greatly appreciated.