I'm trying to extract ip and hostname from a nested json. There are multiple ips and hostnames depending on the alert category. How can we extract and assign all the IPs and hostnames it to target.ip and target.hostname?{"target": { "total_count": 2, "data": [ { "device": [ { "value": "10.10.10.10", "type": "ip" }, { "value": "abc", "type": "hostname" } ], "type": "endpoint", }, { "device": [ { "value": "11.11.11.11", "type": "ip" }, { "value": "z44", "type": "hostname" } ], "type": "endpoint", } ], }}Parser syntax documentation doesn't have references for this type of nested json data where key value pairs are separated.

Extract nested key value pairs json

I tokenized the IPs/Hostnames separately. It is doable but a bit complex when the keys are double-repeated like this.

However target.hostname has a single value unlike the target.IP . Do you need all the 2 IPs/Hostnames to be in a single event so should I go ahead and map the 2 hostnames to another repeated field like target.labels ? or is it ok to split the log entry into multiple separate events ?

filter {
    json {
  source => "message"
  array_function => "split_columns"
}

mutate {
  replace => {
    "ipDedupRegex" => " "
  }
}


mutate {
  replace => {
    "hostDedupRegex" => " "
  }
}



for k,v in target.data map {




for k2,v2 in v.device map {


if [v2][type] == "ip" {



if [v2][value] !~ ipDedupRegex {



    if k=="0" {

        mutate {
        replace => {
            "ipDedupRegex" => "%{v2.value}"
        }
        }




    }

    else {

            mutate {
        replace => {
            "ipDedupRegex" => "%{ipDedupRegex}|%{v2.value}"
        }
        }

    }


        mutate {
        merge => {
            "ipList_" => "v2.value"
        }
        }

}




    statedump {}



}

#if [v2][type] == "hostname" {
#mutate {
#  replace => {
#    "hostname_" => "%{v2.value}"
#  }
#}
#}

if [v2][type] == "hostname" {



if [v2][value] !~ ipDedupRegex {



    if k=="0" {

        mutate {
        replace => {
            "hostDedupRegex" => "%{v2.value}"
        }
        }




    }

    else {

            mutate {
        replace => {
            "hostDedupRegex" => "%{hostDedupRegex}|%{v2.value}"
        }
        }

    }


        mutate {
        merge => {
            "hostList_" => "v2.value"
        }
        }

}




    statedump {}



}


     
}
}
}

@AbdElHafez could you just use indexing for the IP's or hostnames like

target.ip[0]

target.ip[1]

I tokenized the IPs/Hostnames separately. It is doable but a bit complex when the keys are double-repeated like this.

However target.hostname has a single value unlike the target.IP . Do you need all the 2 IPs/Hostnames to be in a single event so should I go ahead and map the 2 hostnames to another repeated field like target.labels ? or is it ok to split the log entry into multiple separate events ?

filter {
    json {
  source => "message"
  array_function => "split_columns"
}

mutate {
  replace => {
    "ipDedupRegex" => " "
  }
}


mutate {
  replace => {
    "hostDedupRegex" => " "
  }
}



for k,v in target.data map {




for k2,v2 in v.device map {


if [v2][type] == "ip" {



if [v2][value] !~ ipDedupRegex {



    if k=="0" {

        mutate {
        replace => {
            "ipDedupRegex" => "%{v2.value}"
        }
        }




    }

    else {

            mutate {
        replace => {
            "ipDedupRegex" => "%{ipDedupRegex}|%{v2.value}"
        }
        }

    }


        mutate {
        merge => {
            "ipList_" => "v2.value"
        }
        }

}




    statedump {}



}

#if [v2][type] == "hostname" {
#mutate {
#  replace => {
#    "hostname_" => "%{v2.value}"
#  }
#}
#}

if [v2][type] == "hostname" {



if [v2][value] !~ ipDedupRegex {



    if k=="0" {

        mutate {
        replace => {
            "hostDedupRegex" => "%{v2.value}"
        }
        }




    }

    else {

            mutate {
        replace => {
            "hostDedupRegex" => "%{hostDedupRegex}|%{v2.value}"
        }
        }

    }


        mutate {
        merge => {
            "hostList_" => "v2.value"
        }
        }

}




    statedump {}



}


     
}
}
}

i.e. This mapping below is more consistent, however looking at the type of logs you are trying to ingest I feel it would fit more in the asset context logs not the event ones ;

filter {
    json {  source => "message"  array_function => "split_columns"}
mutate {convert => {"target.total_count" => "string"}}
mutate {replace => {"count" => "%{target.total_count}"}}
for k,v in target.data map {
            mutate {replace => {"event1" => ""}}
            mutate {replace => {"event1.idm.read_only_udm.metadata.event_type" => "GENERIC_EVENT"}}

    for k2,v2 in v.device map {
        if [v2][type] == "ip" {
            mutate {replace => {"ip" => "%{v2.value}"}}
            mutate {merge => {"event1.idm.read_only_udm.target.ip" => "ip"}}
        }
        if [v2][type] == "hostname"{
            mutate {replace => {"host" => "%{v2.value}"}}
            mutate {rename => {"v2.value" => "event1.idm.read_only_udm.target.hostname"}}
        }
    }


mutate {
  merge => {
    "@output" => "event1"
 }
}

statedump {label=>"outerLoop"}


}
statedump {}
}

@AbdElHafez could you just use indexing for the IP's or hostnames like

target.ip[0]

target.ip[1]

I know but the hostname is unique so it will have to go in the labels section eventually.

I think the 2nd version I added just now is the better version if the data is not ingested within an asset context.

Hi @AbdElHafez Many Thanks for the detailed post. We are getting alerts from a external system and this particular part in json contains the ip/hostname of the machines which are affected. It can range from 1 to 30+. So, we thought to map it to "target" namespace.

When I tested with the config you have provided, it's extracting the same way as you provided in your screenshot. Since it is having timestamp assigned for each extraction. When I validate the parser, it is giving 1000+ events against ingested events of 100 due to individual time stamp assignment.

So, I simplifed like below,

for k,v in target.data map {
for k1,v2 in v.device map {
if [v2][type] == "ip" {
mutate {replace => {"ip" => "%{v2.value}"}}
mutate {merge => {"event1.idm.read_only_udm.target.ip" => "ip"}}
}
if [v2][type] == "hostname"{
mutate {replace => {"host" => "%{v2.value}"}}
mutate {rename => {"v2.value" => "event1.idm.read_only_udm.target.hostname"}}
}
}
}

It's extracting the IP's with target.ip[0]/target.ip[1] and so on but the hostname is getting failed to parse.

Hi @AbdElHafez Many Thanks for the detailed post. We are getting alerts from a external system and this particular part in json contains the ip/hostname of the machines which are affected. It can range from 1 to 30+. So, we thought to map it to "target" namespace.

When I tested with the config you have provided, it's extracting the same way as you provided in your screenshot. Since it is having timestamp assigned for each extraction. When I validate the parser, it is giving 1000+ events against ingested events of 100 due to individual time stamp assignment.

So, I simplifed like below,

for k,v in target.data map {
for k1,v2 in v.device map {
if [v2][type] == "ip" {
mutate {replace => {"ip" => "%{v2.value}"}}
mutate {merge => {"event1.idm.read_only_udm.target.ip" => "ip"}}
}
if [v2][type] == "hostname"{
mutate {replace => {"host" => "%{v2.value}"}}
mutate {rename => {"v2.value" => "event1.idm.read_only_udm.target.hostname"}}
}
}
}

It's extracting the IP's with target.ip[0]/target.ip[1] and so on but the hostname is getting failed to parse.

That is because target.hostname is a unique field unlike target.ip which is repeated that is why I changed the parser to generate an event per host.

ou would need to pick a different field for the hostnames like in the about.labels for example or something similar to parse them. If you could pick which fields to be used for the hostnames then I could change the mapping back to 1 event per entry.

Using about.labels would be a correct call I guess @AbdElHafez

Hi @Aswin_Asokan,
Note that 'labels fields for UDM nouns' (which includes 'about.labels') was deprecated on November 29, 2024[1]. It is recommended to use 'additional.fields'.

[1] - https://cloud.google.com/chronicle/docs/deprecations

Kind Regards,

Ayman

Using about.labels would be a correct call I guess @AbdElHafez

@Aswin_Asokan Could you give some more context about the type of the datasource and use case for the events ? As @AymanC indicated true it seems the about labels may not be a sustainable choice in the future. But I am trying to figure out if these logs are better off as asset context that could be used for enriching other events, or UDM events ? and figure out a proper mapping for the hostnames field.

@AbdElHafez We are looking at the XDR incidents

https://conure.us.security.cisco.com/index.html#/v2/get_v2_incident__incident_id__summary

@Aswin_Asokan In that case the security_result field is probably more suitable.

Please try this version ;

filter {
    json {   source => "message"   array_function => "split_columns" }

mutate {replace => {"ipDedupRegex" => " "}}
mutate {replace => {"hostDedupRegex" => " "}}
mutate {replace => {"event1.idm.read_only_udm.metadata.event_type" => "GENERIC_EVENT"}}
mutate {replace => {"event1.idm.read_only_udm.metadata.vendor_name" => "Cisco"}}
mutate {replace => {"event1.idm.read_only_udm.metadata.product_name" => "XDR"}}

for k,v in target.data map {
    for k2,v2 in v.device map {
        if [v2][type] == "ip" {
            if [v2][value] !~ ipDedupRegex {
                if k=="0" {
                    mutate {replace => {"ipDedupRegex" => "%{v2.value}"}}
                    }
                else {
                    mutate {replace => {"ipDedupRegex" => "%{ipDedupRegex}|%{v2.value}"}}
                    }
            mutate {merge => {"ipList_" => "v2.value"}}
            }

            mutate {replace => {"ip_" => "%{v2.value}"}}
            mutate {merge => {"security_result_.about.ip" => "ip_"}}
            #mutate {rename => {"ip_list" => "zz"}}
            #statedump {}
        }
       else if  [v2][type] == "hostname" {
            if [v2][value] !~ hostDedupRegex {
                if k=="0" {
                    mutate {replace => {"hostDedupRegex" => "%{v2.value}"}}
                    }
                else {
                    mutate {replace => {"hostDedupRegex" => "%{hostDedupRegex}|%{v2.value}"}}
                    }
            mutate {merge => {"hostList_" => "v2.value"}}
            }
            mutate {replace => {"security_result_.about.hostname" => "%{v2.value}"}}
            #mutate {rename => {"host_" => "about_.hostname"}}
            #statedump {}
        }

    #mutate {rename => {"about" => "x.about"}}
    #mutate {merge => {"about_" => "about"}}
    #mutate {rename => {"about_" => "x.about_"}}
    }
    #mutate {rename => {"about" => "x"}}
    mutate {merge => {"event1.idm.read_only_udm.security_result" => "security_result_"}}
    #mutate {rename => {"security_result" => "event1.idm.read_only_udm.security_result"}}
    mutate {replace => {"security_result_" => ""}}
    #mutate {replace => {"about_" => "about"}}

}
    #mutate {merge => {"about_" => "about"}}
statedump {}
mutate {
  merge => {
    "@output" => "event1"
 }
}

#SecurityResult
}

I left some unused tokens "hostList_" and "ipList_" in case you needed them separate.

Sign up

Login with SSO

Login to the community

Login with SSO

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded